An evaluation of reovirus as an effective therapeutic for cancer

Cancer is a global problem. Despite the significant advances made in recent years, a definitively effective therapeutic has yet to be developed. Oncolytic virology has fallen back into favour for the treatment of cancer with several viruses and viral vectors currently under investigation including vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV), adenovirus vectors and herpes simplex virus (HSV) vectors. Reovirus has an advantage over many viral vectors in that its wild-type form is non-pathogenic and will selectively infect transformed cells, particularly those mutated in the Ras pathway. These advantages make Reovirus an ideal candidate as a safe and non-toxic therapeutic. The aim of the first part of this study was to determine the effect, if any, of Reovirus on cell lines derived from cancers of the gastrointestinal tract. These cancers, particularly those of the oesophagus and stomach, have extremely poor prognoses and little improvement has been seen in survival of these patients in recent years. Reovirus as a single therapy showed promising results in cell lines of oesophageal, gastric and colorectal origin. Further study of partially resistant cell lines using a combination of Reovirus and conventional therapies, either chemotherapy or radiation, showed that a multi-modal approach to therapy is possible with Reovirus and no antagonism between Reovirus and other treatments was observed. The second part of this study focused on investigating a novel use of Reovirus in an in vivo setting. Cancer vaccination or the use of vaccines in cancer therapy is gaining momentum and success has been seen both in a prophylactic approach and a therapeutic approach. A cell-based Reovirus vaccine was used in both these approaches with encouraging success. When used as a prophylactic vaccine tumour development was subsequently inhibited even upon exposure to a tumorigenic dose of cells. The use of the cell-based Reovirus vaccine as a therapeutic for established tumours showed significant delay in tumour growth and a prolongation of survival in all models. This study has proven that Reovirus is an effective therapeutic in a range of cancers and the successful use of a cell-based Reovirus vaccine leads the way for new advancements in cancer immunotherapy.

Diphtheria, the public health response and the origins of the childhood immunisation programme in Ireland

In common with most countries, the childhood immunisation programme in Ireland was founded on a successful public health response to diphtheria. The success of the antidiphtheria public health intervention in Ireland has meant that no case of the disease has been recorded in the state for almost fifty years. This is a significant achievement considering that diphtheria continues to appear annually in many European states, albeit in much reduced numbers on former years. For parents and children of nineteenth, and early twentieth-century Ireland, diphtheria represented the ‘most dreaded disease of childhood’, however, for their modern day counterparts diphtheria is no more than an obscure disease mentioned in leaflets promoting the benefits of childhood immunisation. In Ireland, diphtheria has been consigned to history, and so too have the horrors and mass fatalities once associated with it. But how was this achieved? Was active immunisation received with open arms by public health authorities, the wider medical community, and the general public? This study tackles these questions by undertaking the first historical examination of the issues which underpin the origins of active immunisation in Ireland. It explores the driving forces that shaped the national childhood immunisation programme, and those that opposed them. In addition, it examines the complex social implications attendant on the introduction of this mass public health intervention in an Irish context.